HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8136
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '19 at 18:28
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 116
56% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 202
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8136) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6518
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 6.17
Reflection 8.88
Parallax 5.94
5% 7 fps
MRender 8.52
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 13.9
8% 9.31 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 68 55 62 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 468
Write 347
Mixed 122
SusWrite 82
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 29.2
109% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 96
DQ Mixed 102
97% 157 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 82%
Adata SP580 120GB
57GB free
Firmware: V3.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 94 69 64 64 65 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.8% Average
Read 229
Write 191
Mixed 189
SusWrite 92.2
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 10.1
73% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 82
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 16.2
40% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 V01L3SF4GB26826816 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.5
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback