Gbt___ NVDAACPI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemGbt___ NVDAACPI  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte M57SLI-S4
Memory0.3 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20071122
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateDec 08 '19 at 17:35
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Memory 39.7
1-Core 14.5
2-Core 70.8
24% 41.7 Pts
4-Core 79
8-Core 76.4
10% 77.7 Pts
64-Core 78.8
5% 78.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Asus(1043 832E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 340.52
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 2.53
5% 5.09 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 3.61
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 650 120G 120GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 73 84 87 79 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 120
Write 28.8
Mixed 82
SusWrite 79.6
17% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 14.6
49% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 63.4
DQ Write 49.1
DQ Mixed 57.8
43% 56.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 51%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$49
10GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 50 52 52 52 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 32.8
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 51.1
34% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
146GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 68 67 67 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 52.7
Write 34.8
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 65.1
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 4 slots used
1GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.1
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NVDAACPI Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ NVDAACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback