MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B78
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '19 at 15:21
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 86.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 252
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 973
87% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,312
81% 1,312 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 90.2
Parallax 164
86% 120 fps
MRender 88.2
Gravity 111
Splatting 129
92% 109 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 296 297 297 297 297 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 296
Mixed 269
SusWrite 296
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 38.8
156% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 239
205% 303 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
643GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 194 200 200 198 199 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 138
Write 138
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 196
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
135GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 63 62 63 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 64
Write 51.3
Mixed 46
SusWrite 62.5
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 50%
Fujitsu MHZ2500BT G1 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0041000C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 49 50 50 49 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 49.3
Write 45.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 48.6
32% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 28%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
115GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 53 45 28 28 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 127
Write 63.8
Mixed 78
SusWrite 46.1
96% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.6
188% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37%
Great: 35%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
483GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 69
Write 45.3
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 63.6
73% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 31.6
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 28
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78) Builds (Compare 1,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $545
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback