TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell G3 3590

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell G3 3590  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0VFVNR
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '19 at 09:19
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 702
71% 578 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 88.7%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Dell(1028 0949) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Lighting 7.23
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 7.16
6% 24.5 fps
MRender 9.43
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 14.8
9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 6.87%
 Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 0949) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.2% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 49.9
48% 56 fps
MRender 44.7
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 51.2
40% 48.9 fps
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 45.2%
 Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bc501 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 364 364 352 351 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 878
Write 497
Mixed 422
SusWrite 373
120% 542 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 38.6
152% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 336
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 120%
 Great: 142%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
925GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 138 127 127 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 120
Write 126
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 131
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 72.1%
 Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 859B0000802C CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.5% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 15.2
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 18.6
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 57.5%
 Great: 67%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical G3 3590 Builds (Compare 2,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Dell G3 3590

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples1,509x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1,411x
Core i7-9850HIntelBench 77%, 9,974 samples1x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples1,466x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 57%, 12,899 samples855x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples441x
SSD
SN520 NVMe WDC 512GBPCBench 145%, 5,261 samples415x
NVMe TOSHIBA 512GBKbg40zns512gBench 133%, 3,818 samples154x
NVMe SK hynix 512GBBc511Bench 147%, 11,857 samples125x
RAM
HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 2x4GBUnknownBench 62%, 3,853 samples248x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBUnknownBench 74%, 13,906 samples181x
KKN2NM-MIE 2x4GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,182 samples173x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback