HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8260
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170524
Uptime19.2 Days
Run DateDec 07 '19 at 21:34
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 153
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 533
52% 426 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8260) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.7
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 263 188 238 214 230 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 454
Write 378
Mixed 262
SusWrite 229
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 19.2
77% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 230
191% 277 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 104%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
774GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 32 31 34 29 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 19.5
Write 34.5
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 32.4
20% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.1
49% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 15%
Great: 68%
VendorCo ProductCode 1TB
977GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 6 6.3 6.8 6 6.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 14.2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 7.1
14% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22.3
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 22.1
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop Builds (Compare 6,098 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback