Lenovo HuronRiver Platform

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo HuronRiver Platform  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Emerald Lake
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '19 at 10:04
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 84.6
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 112
55% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 188
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 397D) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 3.38
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.38 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.22
2% 2.88 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 364 365 366 369 368 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 428
Mixed 387
SusWrite 370
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 37.6
112% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 368
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 128%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB
16GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.4 9.3 7.4 9 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
9.97% Terrible
Read 28.8
Write 15.4
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 8.6
21% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.1
119% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.97%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5428-101.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HuronRiver Platform Builds (Compare 705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo HuronRiver Platform

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback