Dell PowerEdge R620

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell PowerEdge R620
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R620  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180523
Uptime26.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 17:05
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 0
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 178
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 588
55% 458 Pts
64-Core 888
55% 888 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disk drive 299GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.13
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,940
Write 2,176
Mixed 2,015
458% 2,043 MB/s
4K Read 88.4
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 85.4
293% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 282
212% 282 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 2GB
1GB free
Firmware: 0.3
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 98.5
Write 136
Mixed 82.2
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 4.1
14% 4.87 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 11GB
10GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 98 97 96 98 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.9% Very poor
Read 90.9
Write 118
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 98.8
20% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 3.4
10% 3.6 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 1.5TB
201GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 93 92 68 57 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.2% Very poor
Read 96.4
Write 136
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 76.9
23% 100 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 4.4
15% 5 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 1TB
643GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 83 81 86 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.2% Very poor
Read 91.3
Write 111
Mixed 94.6
SusWrite 83.3
22% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 5.9
21% 6.03 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B2G70BH0-CK0 4x16GB
4 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 21.8
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.2
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge R620 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback