Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	5.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 3.20GHz 33 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	22.9% Poor	Memory 42.2 1-Core 23.5 2-Core 22.4 22% 29.4 Pts	4-Core 23.7 8-Core 23.9 3% 23.8 Pts	64-Core 24.4 2% 24.4 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570 19,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Sapphire(174B E193) 2GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.46% Terrible	Lighting 7.13 Reflection 6.85 Parallax 6.38 6% 6.78 fps	MRender 6.48 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 5.83 5% 5.83 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.46% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25 4,646 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZH100-47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 30 34 31 41 41 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	Read 42.1 Write 43.4 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 33.7 27% 36.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 32%
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85 5,008 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 125GB free Firmware: ZM100-41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 30 35 32 42 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 26.9 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 34.4 22% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 512, 1024, 512 MB Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.9% Terrible	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.03 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 192 21% 192 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.9% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16