HP Z840 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	HP Z840 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2129
Memory	59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160906
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '16 at 03:56
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 1,056 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 92.9 2-Core 188 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 656 59% 497 Pts	64-Core 1292 80% 1292 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 375.63 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Lighting 41.1 Reflection 40.1 Parallax 39.9 34% 40.4 fps	MRender 49.8 Gravity 37.1 Splatting 39.1 34% 42 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512MBF-1A 512GB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 475GB free Firmware: M603 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	75% Very good	Read 487 Write 420 Mixed 453 101% 453 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 17.2 65% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 85.7 102% 179 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 103%
Crucial MTFDDAK512MBF-1A 512GB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 473GB free Firmware: M603 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 490 Write 419 Mixed 455 101% 455 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 25 75% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 36.3 DQ Mixed 11.5 42% 100 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 103%
Crucial MTFDDAK512MBF-1A 512GB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 296GB free (System drive) Firmware: M603 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 487 Write 422 Mixed 455 101% 455 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 15.8 63% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 19 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 84.7 72% 100 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 4x16GB 323 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	MC Read 59.9 MC Write 50.3 MC Mixed 43.3 146% 51.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 17.6 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

System: HP Z840 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	133x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	117x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples	101x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	151x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	104x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	94x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	53x
MTFDDAK512MBF-1A 512GBCrucialBench 89%, 258 samples	48x
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	38x

RAM
M393A2K40BB1-CRC 8x16GBSamsungBench 113%, 218 samples	45x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	40x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 120% - Outstanding

Total price: $93

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16