Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 12:39
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 204
83% 141 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 667
65% 534 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 6.16
5% 12.6 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 13
8% 8.91 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 116 132 95 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 468
Write 156
Mixed 201
SusWrite 111
51% 234 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 19.9
88% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 164
126% 173 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 99%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
633GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 54 53 56 54 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 118
Write 99.7
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 53.6
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
199% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 11.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback