Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '19 at 13:50
Run Duration	97 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Memory 84.9 1-Core 152 2-Core 305 97% 181 Pts	4-Core 602 8-Core 1,185 106% 894 Pts	64-Core 2,143 133% 2,143 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Gigabyte(1458 2311) CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 74 Reflection 78 Parallax 95.4 60% 82.5 fps	Gravity 74.4 Splatting 64.5 61% 69.4 fps
Poor: 51% Great: 62%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 7,775 Write 8,704 Mixed 7782 1,812% 8,087 MB/s	4K Read 283 4K Write 257 4K Mixed 271 913% 270 MB/s	DQ Read 1,781 DQ Write 1,681 DQ Mixed 1,699 1,284% 1,720 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 117GB free Firmware: M0CR070 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 8,092 Write 8739 Mixed 7,923 1,847% 8,251 MB/s	4K Read 302 4K Write 286 4K Mixed 292 983% 293 MB/s	DQ Read 1,311 DQ Write 1,287 DQ Mixed 1,298 975% 1,299 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2OZ 4x8GB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 45.4 MC Write 38.4 MC Mixed 40.9 119% 41.6 GB/s	SC Read 25.7 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 36.7 82% 28.7 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 148%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,035x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	745x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	564x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	561x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	372x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	343x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	419x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	355x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	227x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	219x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	128x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	111x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,266

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16