| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO E5720 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D2594-A1 |
| Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20070731 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 05 '19 at 10:49 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
36.6%
Below average
|
32% 43 Pts
|
4% 33.7 Pts
|
3% 47.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Nvidia(10DE 0915) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
1.67%
Terrible
|
2% 1.96 fps
|
1% 1.64 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$50
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 34 33 34 36 39 MB/s
|
22%
Poor
|
28% 37.9 MB/s
|
116% 0.83 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD050 500GB
258GB free, PID 022b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 25 25 26 24 MB/s
|
15.4%
Very poor
|
34% 26.1 MB/s
|
76% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16.3%
Very poor
|
15% 5.3 GB/s
|
9% 3.2 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ESPRIMO E5720 Builds (Compare 4 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E5720
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Pentium Dual E2160Intel $47Bench 32%, 4,697 samples | 2x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 1x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 26% - Poor | Total price: $106 |