Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory117.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 01:51
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 878
82% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,616
100% 1,616 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 197
Parallax 212
126% 188 fps
MRender 229
Gravity 213
Splatting 133
151% 192 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 128%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,922
Write 1,411
Mixed 635
291% 1,323 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 57.5
204% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 387
DQ Mixed 451
307% 370 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 283%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
83GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 364 319 282 305 317 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 493
Write 372
Mixed 291
SusWrite 324
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 23.9
95% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 144
120% 180 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
302GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 417 417 450 412 460 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 457
Mixed 379
SusWrite 430
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 45.3
156% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 353
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
277GB free
Firmware: EXM03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 462 460 460 426 464 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 445
Mixed 391
SusWrite 450
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 41.6
145% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
53GB free
Firmware: EXM03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 302 110 108 100 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 462
Mixed 401
SusWrite 193
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 48.3
159% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 124%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01K04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 144 157 142 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 156
Mixed 96
SusWrite 152
105% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3400 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 43
135% 47.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 21.6
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $852
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback