Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A79XTD EVO (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100617
Uptime	25.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '16 at 10:46
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 450-$80 4,468 User benchmarks, average bench 44% AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Memory 75.9 1-Core 47.2 2-Core 94.3 47% 72.5 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 140 19% 140 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Gigabyte(1458 34FC) 1GB CLim: 715 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 375.95 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Lighting 15.3 Reflection 17.7 Parallax 13.7 12% 15.6 fps	MRender 21.6 Gravity 15.5 Splatting 18 15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80 11,055 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 188GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 132 130 4383 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8158 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32328 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4577 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 266 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8158 (C2) HDA temperature 104 91 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 8 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	49.2% Average	Read 87.4 Write 83.9 Mixed 67 59% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.4 104% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 61%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$39 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2482 (03) Spinup time 142 140 3858 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1601 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12259 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1593 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 293 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1307 (C2) HDA temperature 108 87 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 18 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.7% Average	Read 81.7 Write 87.7 Mixed 84.6 64% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.33 93% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 59%
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 11GB free Firmware: 1AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 6 (02) Throughput performance 53 53 2726 (03) Spinup time 83 74 5400 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4682 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 20363 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1472 (BF) G-sense error rate 83 83 174309 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 57 193274576928 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 604 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 869 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4691	49.1% Average	Read 86.1 Write 84.7 Mixed 78.6 62% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.43 119% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.2% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 11.6 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 9.6 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 88.6 45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	26x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	26x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	12x

GPU
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	13x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
C300-CTFDDAC128M 128GBCrucialBench 47%, 288 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	27x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	14x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $111

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16