Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190801
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '19 at 08:19
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3600 How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 64.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 235 76% 141 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 757 71% 591 Pts	64-Core 1,047 65% 1,047 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Nvidia(10DE 13AD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 118 Parallax 135 102% 126 fps	MRender 177 Gravity 115 Splatting 102 104% 131 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 404GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 290 280 284 284 281 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 379 Write 311 Mixed 245 SusWrite 285 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 40.6 4K Mixed 24.6 84% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 185 142% 194 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270 9,828 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 687GB free Firmware: ML6OAA10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 89 89 88 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 123 Write 129 Mixed 66 SusWrite 88.1 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 44,547 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	62.6% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 25.4 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 18.6 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,672x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,308x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,436x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $455Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,255x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,087x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,474x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,847x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,108x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	869x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	775x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	730x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $115Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	647x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $973

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16