PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Alienware Aurora-R3 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Alienware 046MHW |
Memory | 3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110525 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 03 '19 at 22:36 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
|
40%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 281 190 105 76 76 MB/s
|
76.6%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
42GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 99 106 103 104 MB/s
|
62.4%
Good
|
|||
Maxtor STM3250820AS 250GB
72GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 56 56 56 56 MB/s
|
32.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1600 MHz
|
34.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 169x |
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 94x |
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples | 28x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 49x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 34x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 30x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $600 |