Acer Aspire E5-551

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-551  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_KV
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 22:20
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7300 APU (2014 M.Ka)
Socket FP3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 68.9
36% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 103
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Acer(1025 0864) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 4.03
3% 4.34 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 6.52
4% 5.38 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X611
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 337 335 325 347 351 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 271
Write 249
Mixed 243
SusWrite 337
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 31.2
106% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 138
108% 149 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 119%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
169GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 67 68 68 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 66.8
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 67.8
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1MNG/4G CT102464BF160B.M16 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.2% Poor
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 9
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-551 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-551

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback