Asus G74Sx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus G74Sx  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G74Sx
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120918
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateDec 05 '16 at 23:06
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 59.5
2-Core 112
52% 82.6 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 280
29% 232 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
Asus(1043 204A) 3GB
CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 372.70
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
8.16% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 7.53
7% 9.25 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 12.8
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.16%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 150 480GB-$389
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 506
Write 487
Mixed 500
111% 498 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 28.1
99% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 73.3
75% 124 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 114%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
351GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 75.2
Write 79.3
Mixed 70.1
56% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.15
46% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 62%
Lexar JumpDrive S23 USB 3.0 64GB-$38
40GB free, PID a833
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 81
Write 69.6
Mixed 30.8
72% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.66
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.78
75% 2.12 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 029E CM3B4G1F1600L9S M471B5273DH0-CH9 029E CM3B4G1F1600L9S 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G74Sx Builds (Compare 476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G74Sx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback