Intel DG41RQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemINTEL_ DG41RQ__
MotherboardIntel DG41RQ  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 12:30
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
J2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 80.6
41% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 77.7
8-Core 80.4
10% 79.1 Pts
64-Core 79.9
5% 79.9 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 4.19
4% 4.26 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.68 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 52 52 53 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.6% Below average
Read 194
Write 124
Mixed 110
SusWrite 51.6
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 17.5
63% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 41.7
DQ Mixed 25
20% 28 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47
61GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 54 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 52.4
Write 22.2
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 53.7
31% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 40%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
58GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 27.8
Mixed 22
SusWrite 18.9
33% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11%
Great: 39%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
423GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 26.7
Write 27.8
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 19
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0
62% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 49%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
3.5TB free, PID ac35
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 13 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 20
Write 13.7
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 13.5
21% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
18.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DG41RQ Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DG41RQ - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $207
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback