Gigabyte GA-X99-SLI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory44.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160530
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateDec 05 '16 at 20:28
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 738
71% 586 Pts
64-Core 907
56% 907 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
MSI(1462 3235) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.19
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 114
Parallax 102
88% 108 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 87.4
76% 93.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT256G1122 256GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2320000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 484
Write 325
Mixed 393
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 3.84
95% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 284
69% 153 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 175
Write 177
Mixed 172
132% 175 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 1.73
116% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 CT8G4DFS8213.M8FB CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 CT8G4DFS8213.M8FB CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
106% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 39.8
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 22.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 106%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $839
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback