Foxconn H61MXV/H67MXV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardFoxconn H61MXV/H67MXV  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 01:22
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 129
64% 101 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 288
38% 287 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD7501AAES-60Z2A0 750GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 06.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 95 95 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 85.5
Write 82.6
Mixed 70
SusWrite 92.6
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 71%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
238GB free
Firmware: GKAOA9DA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 72 74 74 70 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 54.1
Write 52.6
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 73
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MXV/H67MXV Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H61MXV/H67MXV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback