Asrock Z87 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics94.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 00:33
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 250
90% 158 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 667
70% 559 Pts
64-Core 669
41% 669 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.68
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 112
Parallax 117
99% 117 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 100
Splatting 84.4
85% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 451
Write 433
Mixed 303
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 39
158% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 147
163% 277 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Liteonit LMT-128M3M 128GB
31GB free
Firmware: VYC2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 190 195 193 192 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 436
Write 195
Mixed 221
SusWrite 191
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 32.8
131% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 160
141% 214 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 84%
Liteonit LMT-128M3M 128GB
28GB free
Firmware: VYC2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 196 201 200 199 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 427
Write 199
Mixed 225
SusWrite 197
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 30.3
127% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 162
144% 218 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 84%
Liteonit LMT-128M3M 128GB
21GB free
Firmware: VYC2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 195 183 182 197 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 432
Write 201
Mixed 226
SusWrite 190
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 29.7
120% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 164
145% 219 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 84%
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 224 241 242 241 242 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 422
Write 241
Mixed 212
SusWrite 231
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 25.2
135% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 180
169% 266 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 83%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2013)-$60
13GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 73 73 72 73 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 68.5
Write 54.5
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 72.4
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G3D1869DE1TX0. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 23.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 25.4
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 48.9
82% 48.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Extreme4 - $224

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback