Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV_UX581GV (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK UX581GV
Memory	22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3840 x 1100 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '19 at 20:48
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9980HK 8,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 70.3 1-Core 95 2-Core 188 66% 118 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 592 60% 485 Pts	64-Core 240 15% 240 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 19E1) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3184 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.1% Very poor	Lighting 10 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 42.2 8% 21.3 fps	MRender 15 Gravity 49.3 Splatting 54.6 34% 39.6 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 83%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 34,988 User benchmarks, average bench 239% 756GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 725 668 395 762 813 672 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 584 Write 758 Mixed 505 SusWrite 672 142% 630 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 30.2 88% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 204 134% 159 MB/s
Poor: 145% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 329%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CTD 2x16GB 4,312 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 11.6 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 9.4 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	322x
Core i9-9980HKIntelBench 82%, 8,965 samples	276x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	311x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	281x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $479Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	3x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsungBench 239%, 34,988 samples	412x
HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GBBench 132%, 8,930 samples	75x
HFM512GDJTNG-831 512GBNvmeBench 145%, 404 samples	19x

RAM
M471A2G44AM0-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 74%, 4,312 samples	351x
HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 2,000 samples	156x
4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 75%, 6,362 samples	86x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16