Gigabyte GA-N3160ND3V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-N3160ND3V  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180208
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 02 '19 at 15:39
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3160
¯¯¯¯¯¯SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Memory 32.1
1-Core 20.5
2-Core 37.8
20% 30.1 Pts
4-Core 40.9
8-Core 41.6
6% 41.2 Pts
64-Core 39.2
2% 39.2 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 2.77
Parallax 2.59
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.69 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0518BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 215 201 225 220 203 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.8% Below average
Read 181
Write 225
Mixed 146
SusWrite 204
43% 189 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 15.9
46% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 74.6
DQ Write 83.5
DQ Mixed 76
58% 78 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 107%
Plextor PX-128M8VC 128GB
68GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 107 119 103 102 94 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.3% Average
Read 239
Write 201
Mixed 229
SusWrite 110
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 22.5
69% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 83
DQ Mixed 94.4
70% 92.5 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/4G 8GB
1600, 65535 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
15% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 242
16% 242 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-N3160ND3V Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-N3160ND3V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback