MSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7978
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978)  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161017
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 02 '19 at 07:05
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 212
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 567
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.9% Poor
Lighting 28
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 23.7
23% 27 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 29.7
23% 28 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 156 120 47 10 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 452
Write 384
Mixed 173
SusWrite 91.9
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 37.5
136% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 157
148% 232 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MG03ACA200 2TB
603GB free
Firmware: FL1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 114 114 115 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 114
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate Backup+ SL 1.5TB
425GB free, PID ab20
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 74 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 83.3
Write 65.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 75.8
90% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.9% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 21
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978) Builds (Compare 2,334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $581
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback