Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180411
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '19 at 15:20
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$51 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 91.6 2-Core 198 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 263 36% 267 Pts	64-Core 254 16% 254 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36BE) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.2% Below average	Lighting 43.9 Reflection 42.9 Parallax 38 36% 41.6 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 39 Splatting 29.3 28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 336GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG5000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 1.7 38 270 57 170 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 308 Write 300 Mixed 254 SusWrite 119 55% 245 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 12.9 52% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 90.6 DQ Mixed 44.6 49% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 61%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 51GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 150 95 93 86 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 50.7 Write 336 Mixed 280 SusWrite 128 46% 199 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 60.7 4K Mixed 22.3 96% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 307 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 130 119% 187 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 88%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 250GB-$50 5,775 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 210GB free Firmware: X61110RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 205 204 202 203 205 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 382 Write 378 Mixed 287 SusWrite 208 70% 314 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 99.1 4K Mixed 32 133% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 275 207% 277 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 106%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-60A7B2 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 266GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 54 56 55 56 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 100 Write 97.8 Mixed 71 SusWrite 55.4 107% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 42%
ST332082 0AS 320GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 106GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 55 56 56 56 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 50 Write 25.2 Mixed 37 SusWrite 55.6 56% 41.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 28%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 1.9 3.8 3.4 4.6 2.4 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	32% Below average	Read 170 Write 170 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 3.3 112% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 71%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 456GB free, PID a108 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.4 5.3 5.4 5.4 5.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	3.29% Terrible	Read 3.5 Write 5.2 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 5.3 7% 4.62 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 3.29% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G KHX2133C14/8G 16GB 1,977 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	69% Good	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 21.9 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 22.2 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	600x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	469x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	464x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	566x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	403x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	241x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	197x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	133x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	121x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	92x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $394

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48