To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070303
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '19 at 22:29
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ 10 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Memory 78.3 1-Core 31.3 2-Core 30.8 37% 46.8 Pts	4-Core 27.7 8-Core 31.8 4% 29.8 Pts	64-Core 32.8 2% 32.8 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 8C97) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 28.6 Reflection 22.7 Parallax 29.2 23% 26.8 fps	Splatting 31 32% 31 fps
Poor: 24% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fastdisk 120G 120GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2015 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 87 109 148 149 151 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35% Below average	Read 239 Write 144 Mixed 132 SusWrite 117 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 6.7 57% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 67.3 DQ Mixed 7.7 16% 31.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 58%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 132GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 53 65 68 66 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 74.2 Write 66 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 59.1 45% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.93 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	719x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	281x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	267x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	618x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	305x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16