Zoostorm 7876-0848A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemZoostorm 7876-0848A  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z170 Pro4S
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180123
Uptime16.1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '19 at 20:06
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 131
2-Core 240
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 678
67% 550 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.9% Above average
Lighting 75.1
Reflection 79.6
Parallax 76.8
61% 77.2 fps
MRender 77.7
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 64
57% 70.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 459
Write 347
Mixed 271
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 36.3
129% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 142
161% 275 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 37.2
Mixed 80.7
60% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-4GVR Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 0420 F4-2400C15-4GVR Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70.8% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 20.7
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 23.7
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7876-0848A Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Zoostorm 7876-0848A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $808
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $206Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback