Fujitsu LIFEBOOK LH532

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK LH532  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB1F
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '16 at 15:12
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 142
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 339
38% 299 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C2) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2626
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 2.78
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.52
4% 5.06 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 04CB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK LH532 Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK LH532

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback