ECT A_M_I

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	ECT A_M_I (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130715
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '19 at 15:51
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 80.3 2-Core 149 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 450 42% 349 Pts	64-Core 447 28% 447 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% PwrHis(1787 2343) ≥ 4GB CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Lighting 64.1 Reflection 56.7 Parallax 73.6 52% 64.8 fps	MRender 56.9 Gravity 51.3 Splatting 71.6 50% 59.9 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX2 60GB 4,861 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.33 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 45 46 44 41 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 155 Write 60.6 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 45.7 19% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 17.1 67% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 62 DQ Mixed 68 56% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 931GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 189 191 188 163 191 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 118 Mixed 81.4 SusWrite 180 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 112%
SMI USB DISK 16GB 4,910 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 14GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 66.5 Write 20 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 23.5 41% 35 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.1 72% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS 2x8GB 2,652 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	51.6% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 18.1 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 14.3 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A_M_I Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: ECT A_M_I

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	32x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	15x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	6x

RAM
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	17x
CM3B8G2C1600L11 2x8GBCorsairBench 56%, 507 samples	9x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GBCrucialBench 57%, 8,984 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $628

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16