Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '19 at 15:41
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 192
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 375
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Nvidia(10DE 104B) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.8% Average
Lighting 50.3
Reflection 44.5
Parallax 57.9
41% 50.9 fps
MRender 61.4
Gravity 58.9
Splatting 43
43% 54.5 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba A100 120GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA10.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 96 96 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 265
Write 324
Mixed 271
SusWrite 131
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 34.5
136% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 210
185% 274 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 89%
SSDPR-CX400-512 512GB
409GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 291 100 102 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 456
Write 396
Mixed 342
SusWrite 179
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 36.1
137% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 208
181% 267 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 96%
Wilk 32GB
24GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 4.7 5.9 5.7 5.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.02% Terrible
Read 22.8
Write 25.2
Mixed 10
SusWrite 6
20% 16 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
56% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback