PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Notebook P7xxDM(-G) (all builds) |
Motherboard | Notebook P7xxDM(-G) |
Memory | 24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160223 |
Uptime | 3.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 30 '19 at 10:02 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
51.1%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980M
Clevo(1558 7502) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.97
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 238 107 108 111 109 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
49GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 392 160 155 152 142 MB/s
|
114%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
68.9%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 82x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 20x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GTX 980MNvidiaBench 39%, 10,379 samples | 29x |
GeForce GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 6,247 samples | 29x |
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples | 22x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 30% - Below average | Total price: $805 |