Asrock Z270 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 101% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170517
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '19 at 18:56
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Memory 87.1 1-Core 138 2-Core 247 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 431 8-Core 712 70% 571 Pts	64-Core 760 47% 760 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 2471) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2952 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 163 Reflection 189 Parallax 190 133% 181 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 174 Splatting 122 113% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 2.5" 7mm 128GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 289 287 291 289 286 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 482 Write 296 Mixed 303 SusWrite 290 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 34.6 127% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 208 191% 294 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 12%
TRO-2280-128-PRO 128GB 106 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 99GB free Firmware: P0628A SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 147 154 158 157 157 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 310 Write 149 Mixed 149 SusWrite 154 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 83.8 4K Mixed 10.1 86% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 98 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 56.5 62% 103 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 55%
WD Re 2TB-$35 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 876GB free Firmware: 01.01D01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 110 111 110 111 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 130 Write 128 Mixed 112 SusWrite 110 89% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 223% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBR2 8502 3200 C16 Series 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBR2 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.9% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 20.4 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 22 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Extreme4 - $170

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	637x
Core i5-7600KIntel $170Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	176x
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	128x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	127x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	110x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	69x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	60x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	51x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $737

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16