Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181115
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 29 '19 at 07:13
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 94
2-Core 185
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 700
62% 527 Pts
64-Core 889
55% 889 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1440 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
48.1% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 74.3
Parallax 79.4
46% 69.9 fps
MRender 76
Gravity 55.5
Splatting 62.7
53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 132 128 127 233 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 326
Write 106
Mixed 206
SusWrite 163
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 20.9
80% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 51.8
DQ Write 56.4
DQ Mixed 48.6
38% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 93%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
689GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 95.2
Mixed 37.4
50% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70BH0- M393B1G70BH0- M393B1G70QH0- M393B1G70BH0- 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 33.2
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback