| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B |
| Memory | 6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121106 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 28 '19 at 22:42 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2675QM
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
58.4%
Above average
|
59% 93.3 Pts
|
30% 241 Pts
|
18% 295 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B3) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
2.07%
Terrible
|
2% 2.43 fps
|
2% 2.93 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 430 428 371 368 363 MB/s
|
88.6%
Excellent
|
86% 382 MB/s
|
104% 34.2 MB/s
|
244% 327 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB
20GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 13 15 12 15 MB/s
|
24.8%
Poor
|
39% 39.8 MB/s
|
151% 2.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
48%
Average
|
48% 17 GB/s
|
35% 12.2 GB/s
|
53% 75.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B Builds (Compare 85 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2675QMIntelBench 58%, 1,033 samples | 51x |
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 27x |
| Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 58x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $28 |