Packard IMEDIA X1022C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPackard IMEDIA X1022C  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard PT890-8237A
Memory2.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 14:30
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 27.6
2-Core 55.3
32% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 110
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600GS
Sapphire(174B 8090) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 0.44
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.96
2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 72 59 64 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 78.6
Write 76.5
Mixed 41.6
SusWrite 66.2
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
10% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.67 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback