Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 14:02
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 592
55% 460 Pts
64-Core 748
46% 748 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 120
Parallax 138
105% 129 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 113
Splatting 98.9
102% 129 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 350 356 348 353 355 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 421
Mixed 343
SusWrite 351
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 34.8
122% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 348
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 124%
Sandisk SD7SB7S512G1001 512GB
109GB free
Firmware: X3551001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 253 248 255 248 246 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 391
Write 287
Mixed 272
SusWrite 255
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 30.9
124% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 207
173% 252 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 96%
Sandisk SD7SB7S512G1001 512GB
278GB free
Firmware: X3551001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 248 252 251 247 244 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 428
Write 399
Mixed 273
SusWrite 254
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 33
122% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 215
171% 242 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 96%
Thnsf5512gpuk TOSHIBA 512GB
469GB free
Firmware: 51025KLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 445 367 158 432 454 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 411
Write 743
Mixed 629
SusWrite 383
123% 542 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 42.4
128% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 700
DQ Write 509
DQ Mixed 390
350% 533 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 163%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
2TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 138 136 137 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 136
Write 132
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 136
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 151 151 153 151 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 147
Write 113
Mixed 73
SusWrite 150
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback