Gigabyte GA-M68MT-S2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M68MT-S2  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 17:47
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 645
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 88.2
45% 68.8 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 168
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB
CLim: 920 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 28
Parallax 31.5
21% 28.4 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 22
Splatting 32.9
22% 26.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 47 45 46 48 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 112
Write 50.3
Mixed 65
SusWrite 47.2
15% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 16.7
53% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 47.6
DQ Mixed 20.3
20% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
204GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 102 104 104 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 106
Write 108
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 104
67% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-M68MT-S2 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M68MT-S2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback