Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte B150M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B150M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161107
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 03:06
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 216
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 319
43% 320 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 112
Parallax 96.3
91% 106 fps
MRender 97
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 101
81% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 310 308 302 300 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 447
Mixed 444
SusWrite 317
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 62.2
209% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 119%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
428GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 167 166 167 167 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 149
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 166
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 100%
Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 77 70 82 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 84
Write 89.5
Mixed 72
SusWrite 75.4
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.6
143% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 67%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 39
Write 36.7
Mixed 32
SusWrite 4.8
36% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 72%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-22A7B2 640GB
9GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 39.5
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 37.1
47% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 42%
WDC WD10 EVVS-63E1B1 1TB
319GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 42 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 37.5
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 41.1
48% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD KHX2400C15D4/4G 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.1% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 25.1
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 23.7
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B150M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 2,398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback