Asus P5Q-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5Q-PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 01:16
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5450-$299
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 104
50% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 219
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.6% Good
Lighting 81.5
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 105
66% 81.5 fps
MRender 58.4
Gravity 76.6
Splatting 74.9
58% 70 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCT-128M3S 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VQDC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 196 197 181 166 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.9% Above average
Read 257
Write 198
Mixed 179
SusWrite 185
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 30.8
94% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 124
106% 155 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 82%
WL1000GSA3272 1TB
95GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 55 59 60 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 62.9
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 58
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35%
Great: 96%
Drivexpert HDD0 123GB
35GB free
Firmware: 1.2569
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 47.1
Write 47.7
Mixed 36.1
SusWrite 49.5
33% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback