Asrock X99 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 WS (all builds)
Memory	54.9 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150309
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '16 at 18:01
Run Duration	305 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 364 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 80.5 1-Core 92.7 2-Core 190 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 385 8-Core 766 68% 576 Pts	64-Core 1,255 78% 1,255 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200 1,717 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 358.91 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.3% Below average	Lighting 38.9 Reflection 40.7 Parallax 59.3 32% 46.3 fps	MRender 52.4 Gravity 35.3 Splatting 28.3 30% 38.7 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPU512HCGL-00004 512GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: UXM6501Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14316 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 121 (B1) Unknown 85 85 524 (B2) Unknown 92 92 419 (B3) Unknown 92 92 835 (B4) Unknown 92 92 9661 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0
Poor: 53% Great: 87%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 8GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 20010 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 14 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 51 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11689958697	72% Very good	Read 512 Write 410 Mixed 420 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 22.3 81% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.3 DQ Write 43.3 DQ Mixed 15.2 17% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 0GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19240 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 27 (B1) Unknown 98 98 39 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 39 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 20 (F1) Unknown 99 99 38060245264	72.1% Very good	Read 512 Write 408 Mixed 423 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 33.7 4K Mixed 22.1 82% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.8 DQ Write 43.4 DQ Mixed 14.8 17% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 133%
WDC WD10 JPVT-22A1YT0 1TB 21GB free, PID 0700 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.4% Below average	Read 74.1 Write 79.4 Mixed 65.6 94% 73 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.18 77% 0.89 MB/s

Generic Flash HS-COMBO 16GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 15GB free, PID 2228 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	3.41% Terrible	Read 8.57 Write 7.32 Mixed 7.78 10% 7.89 MB/s	4K Read 2.02 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 10% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.41% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 96GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 118% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	112% Outstanding	MC Read 49.8 MC Write 42.9 MC Mixed 41.6 128% 44.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 18.3 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 79.6 50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 WS Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 74%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 WS

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	16x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	9x
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	5x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	3x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
XP960LE30002 960GBBench 131%, 5 samples	4x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	4x

RAM
M393A2G40EB1-CRC 8x16GBSamsungBench 113%, 73 samples	4x
HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 61%, 375 samples	4x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GBSamsungBench 112%, 591 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $465

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16