HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131217
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 25 '19 at 01:54
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 85
1-Core 124
2-Core 236
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 640
65% 526 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 6.35
Parallax 6.59
3% 5.67 fps
MRender 8.67
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 7.65
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.7% Good
Lighting 83.1
Reflection 76.7
Parallax 61.8
68% 73.9 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 84.5
Splatting 76.5
70% 87.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 102 89 107 78 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 122
Write 119
Mixed 59
SusWrite 89.6
71% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3808110AS 80GB-$33
20GB free
Firmware: H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 48 49 53 55 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 48
Write 36.7
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 51.5
32% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 41%
HUAWEI MMC Storage 8GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 3.9 4 3.9 4.5 4 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Read 5.3
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.1
5% 4.05 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
38% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback