Lenovo 239245U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 239245U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 239245U
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '19 at 22:02
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 148
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 206
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 5.73
Parallax 3
4% 4.37 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.35
5% 5.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 63 180 188 170 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 421
Write 330
Mixed 342
SusWrite 168
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 24.6
92% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 197
179% 271 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 89AD NMSO380D81-1600C 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 239245U Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 239245U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback