Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion NC757AA-ABA a6757c (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON NARRA3
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081009
Uptime	28.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '19 at 04:46
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9950 2,150 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Memory 66.8 1-Core 37.6 2-Core 75.9 39% 60.1 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 143 20% 147 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% EVGA(3842 1452) 1GB CLim: 882 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.18% Terrible	Lighting 10.7 Reflection 12.4 Parallax 9 9% 10.7 fps	MRender 14 Gravity 11.1 Splatting 12 10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.18% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 90GB-$96 764 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 93 96 97 97 98 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.3% Average	Read 104 Write 96.9 Mixed 97.3 SusWrite 94 22% 98 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 26.1 91% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 30.1 DQ Write 66.7 DQ Mixed 32.9 30% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 78%
Gigaston e Prime Seri 512GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 476GB free Firmware: S022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 183 187 191 70 115 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.9% Average	Read 231 Write 188 Mixed 190 SusWrite 152 43% 190 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 19 91% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 23.8 32% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 8 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.4 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM