HP Compaq Mini 311

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive7.71% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Mini 311  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3651
Memory1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '19 at 23:43
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Memory 38.1
1-Core 9.2
2-Core 8.4
16% 18.6 Pts
4-Core 8.8
8-Core 9
1% 8.9 Pts
64-Core 9.2
1% 9.2 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia ION
HP(103C 3651) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8644
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 0.19
1% 0.94 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.46 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 16 13 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
7.71% Terrible
Read 138
Write 24.5
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 15.9
12% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
4% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 7.71%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JSF12864HZ-1G4F1 Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 3GB
1666, 1666 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.15% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.73 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 0.8
3% 1.2 GB/s
Latency 211
19% 211 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.15%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback