Asus Z87-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z87-C  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131003
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '19 at 16:16
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770S-$112
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 636
69% 549 Pts
64-Core 638
40% 638 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 24
Parallax 31.1
20% 26.5 fps
MRender 33.4
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 24.9
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 438 451 450 456 443 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 429
Mixed 310
SusWrite 424
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 43.1
149% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 153
166% 280 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 106%
Great: 116%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
654GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 96
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 90.7
56% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.6
231% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 92%
ASMT 2115 128GB
53GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 151 151 151 151 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 354
Write 152
Mixed 196
SusWrite 149
258% 213 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 14.4
1,427% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 23.2
1,340% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 167%
Great: 198%
SAMSUNG SP2504C 250GB
60GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 48 37 42 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 37.7
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 45.7
50% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 28%
Crucial_ CT480M500SSD1 480GB
377GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 48 37 42 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
124% Outstanding
Read 220
Write 197
Mixed 200
SusWrite 45.8
215% 166 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 16.1
1,473% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 13
DQ Write 38.4
DQ Mixed 17.7
1,956% 23 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 124%
Great: 170%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1642 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.1% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-C Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z87-C - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback