Asus G751JT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G751JT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G751JT
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '19 at 07:44
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 160
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 406
44% 351 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Asus(1043 22DA) 3GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 37.8
36% 41.4 fps
MRender 43.6
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 37.5
33% 40.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S128G1002 128GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3310002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 177 178 162 177 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 466
Write 432
Mixed 279
SusWrite 166
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 34.9
122% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 216
180% 259 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 83%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
336GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 127 128 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 122
Write 98.8
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 127
67% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 75%
Card 16GB
13GB free, PID 0747
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8.2 8.1 7.7 8.2 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.77% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 7.9
Mixed 8.9
SusWrite 7.9
13% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.3
75% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8A-PB HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 12.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 12.1
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 94
43% 94 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G751JT Builds (Compare 639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus G751JT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback