bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180821
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 22 '19 at 18:41
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 105
61% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 110
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 1GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.16.1.1
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 9.25
7% 7.55 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 11.4
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme VMware Virtual N 107GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 228 98 91 88 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
131% Outstanding
Read 1,325
Write 1,065
Mixed 1,169
SusWrite 174
208% 933 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 60.3
206% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 77
DQ Write 67.8
DQ Mixed 69.3
53% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 131%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-2048MB 1x2GB
1 of 128 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback