Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '19 at 17:36
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 92.8 1-Core 156 2-Core 292 100% 181 Pts	4-Core 623 8-Core 854 93% 739 Pts	64-Core 880 54% 880 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.20 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22% Poor	Lighting 24.9 Reflection 28.7 Parallax 23.3 20% 25.6 fps	MRender 35.5 Gravity 24.9 Splatting 32.5 25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB 87,883 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 715 535 535 546 545 544 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 1,334 Write 896 Mixed 322 SusWrite 570 173% 781 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 50.2 174% 65.7 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 551 DQ Mixed 310 268% 388 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 277%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 8GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 514 Write 488 Mixed 459 109% 487 MB/s	4K Read 48.5 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 61.2 211% 73.9 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 298 230% 310 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 199GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 101 107 114 113 110 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 110 Write 131 Mixed 29 SusWrite 109 69% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 400GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 145 149 148 152 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 149 Write 132 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 146 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 19GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 135 125 118 116 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 129 Write 128 Mixed 73.8 SusWrite 122 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 159GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 125 128 127 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 118 Write 86.5 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 126 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 146GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 98 98 97 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	63% Good	Read 122 Write 95 Mixed 72 SusWrite 97.7 71% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 469GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 154 156 156 159 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Read 146 Write 131 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 155 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 4x8GB 1,103 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2600 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 29.5 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 36.7 SC Mixed 28.8 82% 28.6 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,557 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $349

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,893x
Core i7-9700KIntel $263Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,619x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $292Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	560x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,312x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	653x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	643x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	862x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	569x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	492x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	283x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	255x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,294

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16