Asrock P67 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock P67 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110905
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 22 '19 at 16:28
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 28,961,044 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 96.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 202
80% 136 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 500
53% 423 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2355 MHz, MLim: 2249 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 3.77
Parallax 5.87
1% 3.58 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 5
Splatting 84.2
32% 33.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 32 72 104 54 10 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 361
Write 117
Mixed 232
SusWrite 74.4
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 21.6
102% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 135
133% 205 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
265GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 156 156 155 157 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 108
Mixed 99.8
SusWrite 156
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
71.8% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 22.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 21.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 50.6
79% 50.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme6 - $202

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback